* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
@ 2003-08-03 18:29 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-03 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-03 18:29 -------
HJL's patches are unacceptable for various reasons explained on the list.
The standalone demangler written in C currently in libiberty needs to be fixed
(or replaced by a similar object written in C). The standalone C++ demangler
could perhaps be converted to C if I had a copy of cfront. ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
2003-08-03 18:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-04 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|bkoz at redhat dot com |neroden at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-04 16:01 -------
Nathan has volunteered to fix the "C" demangler. Thanks! You can find the
current bugs in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/demangle.
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
2003-08-03 18:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2003-08-04 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2003-08-04 16:11 -------
libstdc++ is not needed to verify demangler in libiberty. I added all the
needed testcases to libiberty. If "make check" in libiberty passes without
a single demangler failure, the demangler is fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com @ 2003-08-04 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
------- Additional Comments From neroden at twcny dot rr dot com 2003-08-04 16:28 -------
Subject: Re: The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work
on some symbols
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
>
>
> bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AssignedTo|bkoz at redhat dot com |neroden at gcc dot gnu dot
> | |org
> Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-04 16:01 -------
> Nathan has volunteered to fix the "C" demangler. Thanks! You can find the
> current bugs in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/demangle.
Oh good; it's unfixable without a list of bugs, of course... :-)
I'm afraid I've been delaying all work on libiberty due to the copyright
issues in libiberty, so this won't actually get done until that's
resolved. :-/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
@ 2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-23 6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-24 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4 |---
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-24 19:57 -------
This is probably not going to be fixed for 3.4. (Although I will make an effort, I seriously doubt it will be doable in time.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-23 6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-01 3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-23 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-23 06:56 -------
The demangler has been fixed for some testcases but still need some more work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-23 6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-01 3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-23 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-23 21:42 -------
Ian Lance Taylor has been doing the work on the new libiberty demangler.
Everyone thank him. :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
[not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-01 3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-01 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-01 03:03 -------
Closing as fixed because it is fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread