public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete
@ 2003-07-29  6:03 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-29 12:01 ` [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-29  6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703

           Summary: Problem with using enum in placement delete
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: snyder at fnal dot gov
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


g++ gives an error for the code below, which i believe to be valid:

$ g++ -c -Iinclude x.cc
x.cc: In function `void make()':
x.cc:16: error: invalid conversion from `int' to `Refcount_Type'
$

I think this problem was introduced by the patch to fix c++/11667.

Environment:
System: Linux karma 2.4.19-emp_2419p5a829i #1 Tue Sep 3 17:42:17 EST 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686

	<machine, os, target, libraries (multiple lines)>
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc --enable-threads=posix --enable-long-long --enable-languages=c,c++,f77

How-To-Repeat:


-----------------------
typedef unsigned int size_t;

enum Refcount_Type {
  NO_REFCOUNT,
};

struct d0_Unknown_Object
{
  void* operator new (size_t, size_t,  Refcount_Type type);
  void operator delete (void*, size_t, Refcount_Type);
  d0_Unknown_Object ();
};

void make ()
{
  new (10, NO_REFCOUNT) d0_Unknown_Object;
}
-----------------------
------- Additional Comments From snyder at fnal dot gov  2003-07-29 06:03 -------
Fix:
	<how to correct or work around the problem, if known (multiple lines)>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-29 12:01 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-08-02  4:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-29 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
           Priority|P2                          |P1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-29 12:01:04
               date|                            |
            Summary|Problem with using enum in  |[3.4 Regression] Problem
                   |placement delete            |with using enum in placement
                   |                            |delete
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-29 12:01 -------
I can confirm this on i686-pc-linux-gnu on the mainline (20030729, Tue Jul 29 04:16:44 
UTC 2003) but on powerpc-apple-darwin6.3 (where I had to change size_t to be a 
unsigned long), it does not fail for some reason.
And it does not fail in 20030728 so this is a regression.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-29 12:01 ` [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-08-02  4:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-08-04 18:55 ` snyder at fnal dot gov
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-02  4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-02 04:15 -------
Fixed in the mainline (20030801), will submit a testcase.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-29 12:01 ` [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-08-02  4:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-08-04 18:55 ` snyder at fnal dot gov
  2003-08-04 19:20 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: snyder at fnal dot gov @ 2003-08-04 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703



------- Additional Comments From snyder at fnal dot gov  2003-08-04 18:55 -------
I still see this error in 20030804.

GNU C++ version 3.4 20030804 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4 20030728 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31909
gccbug11703.cc: In function `void make()':
gccbug11703.cc:16: error: invalid conversion from `int' to `Refcount_Type'


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-04 18:55 ` snyder at fnal dot gov
@ 2003-08-04 19:20 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-08-07 18:38 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-04 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-04 19:19 -------
I need to stop testing bugs where they did not fail before (powerpc-apple-darwin6.6).
Sorry about that.
I can confirm this fails on the mainline (20030804) on i686-pc-linuc-gnu.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-04 19:20 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-08-07 18:38 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-08-11 21:40 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-07 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-07 18:38 -------
>From Phil's regression hunter: Search converges between 2003-07-28-trunk (#356) and 
2003-07-29-trunk (#357).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-07 18:38 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-08-11 21:40 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
  2003-08-12 22:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-12 22:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com @ 2003-08-11 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


------- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com  2003-08-11 21:40 -------
I can confirm the submitter's suspicion that the regression in PR 11703        
was introduced or exposed by the fix for PR 11667 on 2003-07-28.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-11 21:40 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2003-08-12 22:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-12 22:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-12 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703



------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-12 22:26 -------
Subject: Bug 11703

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org	2003-08-12 22:26:26

Modified files:
	gcc/cp         : ChangeLog call.c class.c cp-tree.h decl.c 
	                 decl2.c lex.c parser.c pt.c ptree.c semantics.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
	gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other: decl5.C 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init: new8.C 
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse: qualified2.C ret-type2.C typedef5.C 

Log message:
	PR c++/11703
	* call.c (type_passed_as): Use TYPE_SIZE, not TYPE_PRECISION to
	determine whether or not to promote types.
	(convert_for_arg_passing): Likewise.
	* decl2.c (cp_build_parm_decl): Do not set DECL_ARG_TYPE in
	templates.
	* pt.c (tsubst_decl): Do not expect it to be set.
	
	PR c++/9512
	PR c++/10923
	* cp-tree.h (check_elaborated_type_specifier): Declare.
	(handle_class_head): Remove.
	(note_got_semicolon): Likewise.
	(note_list_got_semicolon): Likewise.
	(finish_class_definition): Likewise.
	* decl.c (check_elaborated_type_specifier): Make it public.
	Robustify.
	(handle_class_head): Remove.
	* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier): Use
	check_elaborated_type_specifier.
	(cp_parser_class_specifier): Do not call finish_class_definition.
	(cp_parser_class_head): Or handle_class_head.  Check for
	over-qualified names.
	* semantics.c (finish_class_definition): Remove.
	
	* parser.c (cp_parser_check_for_definition_in_return_type): New
	function.
	(cp_parser_simple_declaration): Adjust call to
	cp_parser_init_declarator.
	(cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Change type of
	declares_class_or_enum parameter.
	(cp_parser_explicit_instantiation): Adjust accordingly.
	(cp_parser_type_specifier): Change type of
	declares_class_or_enum parameter.
	(cp_parser_init_declarator): Add declares_class_or_enum
	parameter.
	(cp_parser_parameter_declaration): Adjust call to
	cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq.
	(cp_parser_function_definition): Likewise.
	(cp_parser_member_declaration): Likewise.
	(cp_parser_single_declaration): Likewise.
	
	* cp-tree.h (lang_type_class): Remove has_call_overloaded,
	has_array_ref_overloaded, has_arrow_overloaded, and got_semicolon.
	(TYPE_OVERLOADS_CALL_EXPR): Remove.
	(TYPE_OVERLOADS_ARRAY_REF): Likewise.
	(TYPE_OVERLOADS_ARROW): Likewise.
	(CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON): Likewise.
	* class.c (check_bases): Do not set them.
	(finish_struct_1): Likewise.
	* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Do not set CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON.
	(build_ptrmemfunc_type): Likewise.
	(grok_op_properties): Do not set TYPE_OVERLOADS_*.
	(start_function): Do not check CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON.
	* decl2.c (grokfield): Do not set CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON.
	* lex.c (note_got_semicolon): Remove.
	(note_list_got_semicolon): Likewise.
	* parser.c (cp_parser_simple_declaration): Do not call
	note_list_got_semicolon.
	* pt.c (list_eq): Remove.
	(lookup_template_class): Do not set CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON.
	(instantiate_class_template): Do not set TYPE_OVERLOADS*.
	(instantiate_class_template): Do not set CLASSTYPE_GOT_SEMICOLON.
	* ptree.c (cxx_print_type): Do not print them.
	* semantics.c (finish_member_class_template): Do not call
	note_list_got_semicolon.
	
	* g++.dg/parse/ret-type2.C: New test.
	
	PR c++/11703
	* g++.dg/init/new8.C: New test.
	
	PR c++/10923
	* g++.dg/parse/typedef5.C: New test.
	
	PR c++/9512
	* g++.dg/parse/qualified2.C: New test.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/decl5.C: Mark one more instance of
	invalid code.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3597&r2=1.3598
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/call.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.420&r2=1.421
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/class.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.562&r2=1.563
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.900&r2=1.901
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1111&r2=1.1112
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.658&r2=1.659
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/lex.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.314&r2=1.315
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.99&r2=1.100
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.754&r2=1.755
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ptree.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.344&r2=1.345
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2968&r2=1.2969
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new8.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ret-type2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/typedef5.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/decl5.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] Problem with using enum in placement delete
  2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-12 22:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-12 22:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-12 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11703


mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-12 22:28 -------
Fixed in GCC 3.4.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12 22:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-29  6:03 [Bug c++/11703] New: Problem with using enum in placement delete gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-29 12:01 ` [Bug c++/11703] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-02  4:15 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-04 18:55 ` snyder at fnal dot gov
2003-08-04 19:20 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-07 18:38 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-08-11 21:40 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
2003-08-12 22:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-12 22:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).