[Bug c++/11797] New: Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[Bug c++/11797] New: Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[mruff at chiaro dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797

           Summary: Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: mruff at chiaro dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
  GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Hey all,

   I worked though the Icarus Verilog build issues with GCC3.3.  I just 
   want verification that this change in behavior is expected.  This is
   not target specific since my redhat7.2 GCC3.3 build fails similarly.

Please peek at:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2003-07/msg00303.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2003-07/msg00306.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2003-07/msg00307.html

[Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-04 23:46 -------
The code is invalid as it  declears svector<string>::svector<string>(unsigned size) as 
extern add static or inline in front of it.

[Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[mruff at chiaro dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797



------- Additional Comments From mruff at chiaro dot com  2003-08-05 00:20 -------
Subject: RE:  Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

I should have mentioned that I tried static, but...

static svector<string>::svector<string>(unsigned size)
: nitems_(size), items_(new string[size])
{
}

produces...

GCC:3.2.2

In file included from PTask.h:26,
                 from PTask.cc:25:
svector.h:105: cannot declare member function `svector<TYPE>::svector(unsigned
   int) [with TYPE = std::string]' to have static linkage

GCC3.3:

In file included from PTask.h:26,
                 from PTask.cc:25:
svector.h:105: error: cannot declare member function `
   svector<TYPE>::svector(unsigned int) [with TYPE = std::string]' to have
   static linkage

I know this is not the place to learn C++, but :-) how would one
declare the member function to be out of line but with file scope?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
> [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:47 PM
> To: Michael Ruff
> Subject: [Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous
> versions
> 
> 
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* 
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797
> 
> 
> pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |INVALID
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc 
> dot edu  2003-08-04 23:46 -------
> The code is invalid as it  declears 
> svector<string>::svector<string>(unsigned size) as 
> extern add static or inline in front of it.
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>

[Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-05 00:22 -------
Use inline then as I had suggested.

[Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

[mruff at chiaro dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797



------- Additional Comments From mruff at chiaro dot com  2003-08-05 00:29 -------
Subject: RE:  Change in inlining behavior vs. previous versions

We already have thanks... We were just curious if
this behavior change is expected. Since it's invalid code
I think YES would be the proper response... I'll let
Steve pursue the out of line definition.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
> [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:23 PM
> To: Michael Ruff
> Subject: [Bug c++/11797] Change in inlining behavior vs. previous
> versions
> 
> 
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* 
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11797
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc 
> dot edu  2003-08-05 00:22 -------
> Use inline then as I had suggested.
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>