From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3969 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2003 00:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3932 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2003 00:05:38 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 00:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030805000538.3931.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030801174818.11765.hovik@melikyan.com> References: <20030801174818.11765.hovik@melikyan.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11765] typecast vs. constructor ambiguity X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11765 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 00:05 ------- ICC 6.0 calls "ClassTwo::operator ClassOne()" then "ClassTwo::ClassTwo(ClassOne const&)" but I think this is invalid now looking at the code some more but I am not the last person who has that say.