From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26974 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2003 02:23:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26956 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2003 02:23:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030805022325.26954.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030602121501.11063.ElGringo@gmx.at> References: <20030602121501.11063.ElGringo@gmx.at> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11063] [3.3/3.4 Regression] ICE on parsing initialization list of const array member X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00604.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11063 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 02:23 ------- Is this code really invalid as a gcc extension (from C99) of style C99 inits for structs/ arrays is being use?