public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
[not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
@ 2003-05-25 4:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-25 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-05-25 04:17 -------
Hello,
I can confirm that this problem is still present on gcc 3.2, 3.3 branch and mainline (20030524).
Takes ~18 seconds on a P-III 733MHZ...
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
[not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
2003-05-25 4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-05 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 15:22 -------
Suspending this as the same reason for changing this to an enhancement.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
[not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
2003-05-25 4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2005-01-13 21:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-13 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13 21:23 -------
Hmm, this is one of the cases where we should be able optimize away really but the general case we
can try to.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|rtl-optimization |other
Last reconfirmed|2004-02-08 05:35:11 |2005-01-13 21:23:12
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-13 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
2003-05-25 4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).