public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11752] partial ordering overloaded function templates Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:29:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030805162931.5779.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030731184837.11752.nbecker@fred.net> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11752 lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-05 16:29 ------- Not a bug. According to the standard, partial ordering is defined based on template argument deduction. Since the parameter 'size' is not used anywhere in function parameter or return type, it's not deducable and partial ordering fails. So both are treated as equal, none is more specialized than the other.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-05 16:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-07-31 18:48 [Bug c++/11752] New: " nbecker at fred dot net 2003-07-31 19:08 ` [Bug c++/11752] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-31 19:16 ` nbecker at hns dot com 2003-08-04 14:54 ` nbecker at fred dot net 2003-08-04 14:58 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-04 14:58 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-04 19:44 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 16:29 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2003-08-05 16:33 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-05 16:50 ` nbecker at hns dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030805162931.5779.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).