From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5813 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2003 18:37:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5798 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2003 18:37:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 18:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030805183734.5795.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030805183338.11811.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20030805183338.11811.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11811] Weird error message with default template arguments X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00713.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11811 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-05 18:37:34 date| | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-05 18:37 ------- I can confirm this on the mainline (20030805). 2.95.3 did not warn at all. 3.0.4 used {} instead <> for template default argument error which is just as confusing.