* [Bug target/9200] [sparc-solaris] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
@ 2003-05-26 20:32 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-26 20:36 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-26 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-05-26 20:21 -------
Hello,
I can confirm that this bug is still present on gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030507).
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/9200] [sparc-solaris] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2003-05-26 20:32 ` [Bug target/9200] [sparc-solaris] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-05-26 20:36 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-08-06 3:46 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-26 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-05-26 20:34:42
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-26 20:34 -------
See Dara's comment.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/9200] [sparc-solaris] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2003-05-26 20:32 ` [Bug target/9200] [sparc-solaris] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64 dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-05-26 20:36 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2003-08-06 3:46 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-09-30 23:10 ` [Bug middle-end/9200] " ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-06 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-06 3:46 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-09-30 23:10 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-30 23:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-30 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 23:00 -------
Fixed by this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01694.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-30 23:10 ` [Bug middle-end/9200] " ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-30 23:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-13 14:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-30 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 23:01 -------
Subject: Bug 9200
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: ghazi@gcc.gnu.org 2003-09-30 23:01:21
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
Log message:
Add PR 9200 to prior patch
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.1232&r2=2.1233
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-30 23:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-13 14:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-28 8:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-13 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-13 14:25 -------
The testcase still fails at -O0 and -O1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-13 14:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-28 8:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-19 9:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-28 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-28 8:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-19 9:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-08 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-19 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 9200 depends on bug 12916, which changed state.
Bug 12916 Summary: No vector ABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12916
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-19 9:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-08 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01 15:33 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-08 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-08 20:27 -------
gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-5.c fails in a similar way on mainline with -m64:
simd-5.c: In function `func1':
simd-5.c:29: error: unable to find a register to spill in class `GENERAL_REGS'
simd-5.c:29: error: this is the insn:
(insn 50 49 51 1 (set (reg:HI 4 %g4 [orig:146 q1.0 ] [146])
(subreg:HI (reg:V4HI 107 [ q1.0 ]) 6)) 48 {*movhi_insn} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:V4HI 107 [ q1.0 ])
(nil)))
simd-5.c:29: internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1888
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-08 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-01 15:33 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01 16:33 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-01 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 15:33 -------
simd-5.c succeeded for me on sparc64-linux today both on -O1 and -O0 that is
without any changes in the build tree.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-01 15:33 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-01 16:33 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
2004-11-03 5:13 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: kghazi at verizon dot net @ 2004-11-01 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-01 16:33 -------
Subject: Re: C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
Ditto on Sparc64-solaris2.9, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00030.html
I'm curious though whether it was really fixed or somehow masked by an
unrelated change.
I'd also like to run an -m64 pass against plain sparc and see if it's fixed
there also. Results of that tomorrow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-01 16:33 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
@ 2004-11-03 5:13 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
2004-11-06 18:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: kghazi at verizon dot net @ 2004-11-03 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-03 05:13 -------
Subject: Re: C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
The problem appears to be fixed in every multilib combination.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00098.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00099.html
No idea why though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-03 5:13 ` kghazi at verizon dot net
@ 2004-11-06 18:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-06 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-06 18:09 -------
> The problem appears to be fixed in every multilib combination.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00098.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00099.html
Right.
> No idea why though.
Because of the new "pre_expand" pass from tree-complex.c that expands vector
operations to scalars if there is no hardware support. I'm going to remove the
XFAILs.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/9200] C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
[not found] <20030106120600.9200.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-06 18:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-06 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-06 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread