From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8809 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2003 18:30:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8797 invoked by uid 48); 6 Aug 2003 18:30:12 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030806183012.8795.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030806145118.11834.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20030806145118.11834.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11834] [3.4 regression] template specialization not matched X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00915.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11834 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |rejects-valid ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-06 18:30 ------- After Wolfgang suggestion of using -ftemplate-depth-5 I was able to use Phil's regression hunter: Search converges between 2003-07-07-trunk (#336) and 2003-07-08-trunk (#337). Looks like gcc is not picking up the template specialization of the classes.