From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16638 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2003 18:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16613 invoked by uid 48); 11 Aug 2003 18:49:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030811184931.16612.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> References: <20020423111601.6431.markku.pihlajamaa@luukku.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/6431] [v850] va_arg() fails in expanding arguments X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg01395.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com | GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-08-11 18:49 ------- Now that v850-elf builds again, it looks like 3.4 produces identical asm to 3.1.1 for this testcase. Nick, does this mean this problem is fixed? Thanks, Dara