From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16125 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2003 21:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16109 invoked by uid 48); 11 Aug 2003 21:00:29 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030811210029.16108.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "janis187 at us dot ibm dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030806091852.11828.benko@sztaki.hu> References: <20030806091852.11828.benko@sztaki.hu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11828] [3.4 regression] qualified dependent name looked up too early X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg01406.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org ------- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-08-11 21:00 ------- The regression in PR 11828 was introduced or exposed by the new C++ parser, added to mainline on 2003-12-28. This was verified on i686-pc-linux-gnu with cc1plus built just before and just after that merge, using both the small test case from comment #2 and the submitter's test case.