From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20195 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2003 13:17:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20188 invoked by uid 48); 12 Aug 2003 13:17:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030812131736.20187.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "boaz at hishome dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030812111410.11893.boaz@hishome.net> References: <20030812111410.11893.boaz@hishome.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11893] stdcall pointers to member-functions handled wrong X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg01465.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 boaz at hishome dot net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From boaz at hishome dot net 2003-08-12 13:17 ------- Not true. It is not at all the same bug and this one has no work around. !!!! I have seen bug #4507. As you can see this bug exposes a situation where an __stdcall__ implementation is called by a none __stdcall__ pointer hence causing a SEGFAULT. the Error is not in the code generation of the __stdcall member function, that one is implemented correctly. The bug is in not able to define an __stdcall pointer to a function-member and in allowing an assignment of __stdcall __ function to a none __stdcall__ pointer. Please return the bug. Note that it is marked "critical" since it breaks (with no way to work a round it) use of COM technology on Linux. (Wine project)