From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3723 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2003 01:49:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3697 invoked by uid 48); 13 Aug 2003 01:49:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030813014920.3696.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030813014336.11899.bryce@mckinlay.net.nz> References: <20030813014336.11899.bryce@mckinlay.net.nz> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/11899] java.net.URI class not yet implemented X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg01521.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-13 01:49:20 date| | ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-13 01:49 ------- I can confirm that the source file, java/net/URI.java, functions are empty (aka just stubs).