* [Bug optimization/10050] [SH] Weak optimization on array references in conditiona blocks
[not found] <20030312210600.10050.tm_gccmail@kloo.net>
@ 2003-06-02 17:52 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-16 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-02 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC build triplet| |i386-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet| |i386-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet| |sh-elf
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-02 17:52:26
date| |
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-02 17:52 -------
Confirmed with gcc 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and mainline (20030526).
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug optimization/10050] [SH] Weak optimization on array references in conditiona blocks
[not found] <20030312210600.10050.tm_gccmail@kloo.net>
2003-06-02 17:52 ` [Bug optimization/10050] [SH] Weak optimization on array references in conditiona blocks dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-08-16 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-23 7:50 ` [Bug optimization/10050] Weak optimization on array references pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-16 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug optimization/10050] Weak optimization on array references
[not found] <20030312210600.10050.tm_gccmail@kloo.net>
2003-06-02 17:52 ` [Bug optimization/10050] [SH] Weak optimization on array references in conditiona blocks dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-16 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-23 7:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-24 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/10050] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 6:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-23 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-23 07:50 -------
Maybe SRA could be expended to arrarys (act like structs with n elements).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2003-06-02 17:52:26 |2003-11-23 07:50:47
date| |
Summary|[SH] Weak optimization on |Weak optimization on array
|array references in |references
|conditiona blocks |
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/10050] Weak optimization on array references
[not found] <20030312210600.10050.tm_gccmail@kloo.net>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-23 7:50 ` [Bug optimization/10050] Weak optimization on array references pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-24 11:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 6:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-24 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.5.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/10050] Weak optimization on array references
[not found] <20030312210600.10050.tm_gccmail@kloo.net>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/10050] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-22 6:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-22 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-22 06:40 -------
At least now on the mainline, we the array being kept in registers but we still have the conditional
stores.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread