From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7108 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2003 07:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7101 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2003 07:01:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030819070142.7100.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "derrick at caltech dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030728180253.11695.derrick@cco.caltech.edu> References: <20030728180253.11695.derrick@cco.caltech.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11695] Memory corruption with -O1 and complex ET code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02042.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11695 ------- Additional Comments From derrick at caltech dot edu 2003-08-19 07:01 ------- Subject: Re: Memory corruption with -O1 and complex ET code > Can you try a 3.4 snapshot? > I am having trouble getting even a trivial C++ program to run with the 3.4 snapshots. The programs compile, but refuse to run. I am installing each gcc release into a different directory and somehow the executable is getting very confused as to where to look for its libraries. Have you heard of this problem? Should I file a bug report for that too?