From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-68068-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17288 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2003 22:51:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17277 invoked by uid 48); 19 Aug 2003 22:51:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:51:00 -0000
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20030819225102.11987.bangerth@dealii.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11987] New: ICE/accepts-invalid with inherited nested type
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02125.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11987

           Summary: ICE/accepts-invalid with inherited nested type
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: bangerth at dealii dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

This piece of invalid code 
---------------------------------------- 
template <int dim> struct X { 
    struct I { I(); }; 
}; 
 
template <int dim> struct Y : X<dim> { 
    typedef typename X<dim>::I I; 
}; 
 
template <int dim> 
Y<dim>::I::I () {}  // note: I is nested type in X, not Y! 
 
template struct Y<1>; 
------------------------------------------------ 
ICEs everything up to and including 3.3: 
parameter-estimation/libparest> /ices/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3/bin/g++ -c x.cc 
x.cc:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 
Please submit a full bug report, 
with preprocessed source if appropriate. 
 
On the other hand, present mainline accepts it, which I think is spurious. So 
we traded an ICE for an accepts-invalid. 
 
W.