From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31186 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 05:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31170 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 05:19:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 05:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030820051950.31169.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "derrick at caltech dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030728180253.11695.derrick@cco.caltech.edu> References: <20030728180253.11695.derrick@cco.caltech.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11695] Memory corruption with -O1 and complex ET code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02150.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11695 ------- Additional Comments From derrick at caltech dot edu 2003-08-20 05:19 ------- Subject: Re: Memory corruption with -O1 and complex ET code > You set LD_LIBRARY_PATH right? > It is set. It has both the stable compiler and the gcc-3.4 compiler in it, the stable one coming first. Hmmm... when I switch the order, everything seems to work. I can compile with both the snapshot and my old compiler. Apparently, I do not fully understand the mysteries of LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Is that supposed to happen? I've been using this setup since before the days of egcs-1.0 and this is the first time it has been a problem. Well, anyway, now that things are working, I should have an answer to your original question in a day or two. The code has a bunch of errors that are being caught by the new parser in 3.4, so I need to fix all those before I can say.