public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
@ 2003-08-20 5:28 derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
2003-08-20 6:21 ` [Bug c++/11988] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu @ 2003-08-20 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
Summary: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
If I am understanding correctly, according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Name-lookup.html#Name%20lookup
the following code should compile:
template <typename T> struct Base {
int i;
};
template <typename T> struct Derived : public Base<T> {
int get_i() { using Base<T>::i; return i; }
};
since, according to that document,
"Alternatively, Base<T>::i might be brought into scope by a using-declaration."
However, gcc-3.4-20030813 is rejecting the code with the following errors:
test2.cc: In member function `int Derived<T>::get_i()':
test2.cc:6: error: `Base<T>' is not a namespace
test2.cc:6: error: `i' undeclared (first use this function)
test2.cc:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in.)
Is the documentation wrong (or unclear), or the compiler?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11988] Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
@ 2003-08-20 6:21 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-08-20 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2003-08-20 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-08-20 06:21 -------
Subject: Re: New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
"derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| template <typename T> struct Derived : public Base<T> {
| int get_i() { using Base<T>::i; return i; }
| };
|
| since, according to that document,
| "Alternatively, Base<T>::i might be brought into scope by a using-declaration."
|
| However, gcc-3.4-20030813 is rejecting the code with the following errors:
| test2.cc: In member function `int Derived<T>::get_i()':
| test2.cc:6: error: `Base<T>' is not a namespace
| test2.cc:6: error: `i' undeclared (first use this function)
| test2.cc:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
| function it appears in.)
|
| Is the documentation wrong (or unclear), or the compiler?
The compiler is broken.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11988] Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
2003-08-20 6:21 ` [Bug c++/11988] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2003-08-20 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-20 15:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-20 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-20 11:06:17
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-20 11:06 -------
I can confirm this on the mainline (20030820).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11988] Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
2003-08-20 6:21 ` [Bug c++/11988] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-08-20 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-20 15:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-21 3:30 ` derrick at caltech dot edu
2003-08-21 13:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-20 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-20 15:46 -------
the compiler is correct. A using declaration for a class member shall be a
member-declaration. [7.3.3]/6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11988] Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-20 15:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-21 3:30 ` derrick at caltech dot edu
2003-08-21 13:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: derrick at caltech dot edu @ 2003-08-21 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
------- Additional Comments From derrick at caltech dot edu 2003-08-21 03:30 -------
Subject: Re: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
Ummmm... why was this marked resolved? If the compiler is right, then
there is still a problem in the documentation, which, as far as I can
tell, has not been fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/11988] Using "using" in two-stage name lookup
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-21 3:30 ` derrick at caltech dot edu
@ 2003-08-21 13:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-08-21 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11988
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-21 13:55 -------
In the documentation, the intent was to have the using declaration in class scope, not
within the member, to make the name visible to _all_ members.
W.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-21 13:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-20 5:28 [Bug c++/11988] New: Using "using" in two-stage name lookup derrick at cco dot caltech dot edu
2003-08-20 6:21 ` [Bug c++/11988] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-08-20 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-20 15:46 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-21 3:30 ` derrick at caltech dot edu
2003-08-21 13:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).