public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11828] [3.4 regression] qualified dependent name looked up too early Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:02:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030821060253.16209.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030806091852.11828.benko@sztaki.hu> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-21 06:02 ------- The G++ behavior is correct. Only those declarations of n::f that were available when g is defined are available for overload resolution. See [temp.nondep] in the standard for details.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-21 6:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-08-06 9:18 [Bug c++/11828] New: " benko at sztaki dot hu 2003-08-06 14:39 ` [Bug c++/11828] " bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-07 7:06 ` benko at sztaki dot hu 2003-08-07 13:20 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-07 13:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-08-11 7:04 ` benko at sztaki dot hu 2003-08-11 21:00 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-08-21 6:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-04-26 12:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-11 18:34 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-11 18:38 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-11 18:53 ` [Bug c++/11828] [3.4/3.5 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-11 18:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-11 19:23 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-11 19:24 ` jason at redhat dot com 2004-05-11 19:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-06-03 22:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-10 20:04 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 13:53 ` [Bug c++/11828] [3.4/4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-21 19:12 ` smcpeak at cs dot berkeley dot edu 2005-03-03 22:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-04 5:00 ` smcpeak at cs dot berkeley dot edu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030821060253.16209.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).