From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-68550-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27561 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2003 01:44:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27550 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2003 01:44:08 -0000
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030823014408.27549.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030109010600.9240.miles@gnu.org>
References: <20030109010600.9240.miles@gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/9240] weird scheduling on v850 unless -fno-sched-spec specified
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02607.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9240


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |---