From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2745 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2003 14:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2734 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2003 14:24:20 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030823142420.2733.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030818124133.11965.jk@tools.de> References: <20030818124133.11965.jk@tools.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/11965] [3.3/3.4 Regression] On SPARC, gcc produces invalid assembler code for a shift << 32 operation X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02673.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11965 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c |target Summary|On SPARC, gcc produces |[3.3/3.4 Regression] On |invalid assembler code for a|SPARC, gcc produces invalid |shift << 32 operation |assembler code for a shift | |<< 32 operation Target Milestone|--- |3.3.2 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-23 14:24 ------- This is a regression from 3.2.3 and there is even a patch. Martin can you send the patch to gcc-patches saying this fixes this PR?