public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
@ 2003-06-29 10:39 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2003-07-06  1:31 ` [Bug c/11369] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2003-06-29 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369

           Summary: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i386-linux
  GCC host triplet: i386-linux
GCC target triplet: i386-linux

[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/197504]

int foo(void);

int foo()
{
	return 42;
}
$ gcc -c -Wstrict-prototypes gcc-bug.c
$

Bug submitter expected gcc to raise a warning in line 3, because a function is
declared with an unknown parameter list instead of an empty list.
Instead, line 3 should look like "int foo(void)".


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11369] too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
  2003-06-29 10:39 [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2003-07-06  1:31 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-07-18 22:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-07-06  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-06 01:31:34
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |---


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-06 01:31 -------
Confirmed with mainline (20030705) and current branch.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11369] too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
  2003-06-29 10:39 [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2003-07-06  1:31 ` [Bug c/11369] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-07-18 22:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-08-23 21:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-20  7:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-07-18 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GCC build triplet|i386-linux                  |
   GCC host triplet|i386-linux                  |
 GCC target triplet|*-*-*                       |
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
   Last reconfirmed|2003-07-06 01:31:34         |2003-07-18 22:55:01
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-18 22:55 -------
The EDG front-end doesn't get this right either.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11369] too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
  2003-06-29 10:39 [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2003-07-06  1:31 ` [Bug c/11369] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2003-07-18 22:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-08-23 21:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-20  7:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-23 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369



------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-23 21:19 -------
Subject: Bug 11369

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	hubicka@gcc.gnu.org	2003-08-23 21:18:58

Modified files:
	gcc            : expr.c ChangeLog 
	gcc/config/i386: i386.c i386.h i386.md 

Log message:
	PR target/11369
	* i386.c (ix86_expand_carry_flag_compare): Validate operand.
	
	PR target/11031
	* i386.c (const_0_to_3_operand, const_0_to_7_operand,
	const_0_to_15_operand, const_0_to_255_operand): New predicates.
	* i386.h (PREDICATE_CODES): Add these.
	* i386.c (pinsrw and pextrw patterns): Use them.
	
	PR target/10984
	* i386.c (ix86_expand_binop_builtin): Behave sanely for VOIDmodes.
	
	PR target/8869
	* expr.c (convert_modes): Deal properly with integer to vector
	constant conversion.
	
	PR target/8871
	* i386.md (zero_extendsidi2*): Add MMX and SSE alternatives.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/expr.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.577&r2=1.578
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.864&r2=2.865
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.595&r2=1.596
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.350&r2=1.351
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.md.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.480&r2=1.481


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/11369] too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes
  2003-06-29 10:39 [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-23 21:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-20  7:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-20  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-20 07:16 -------
This is invalid as the documentation talks about "prototypes" non existant:
Warn about unprototyped function declarations

In this case foo is prototyped.
The flag you want is -Wold-style-definition instead but this only added for 3.4, closing as 
fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-20  7:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-29 10:39 [Bug c/11369] New: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-07-06  1:31 ` [Bug c/11369] " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-07-18 22:55 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-08-23 21:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-20  7:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).