From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-68724-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1012 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2003 16:27:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 972 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2003 16:27:27 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030824162727.971.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030429131601.10536.uweigand@de.ibm.com>
References: <20030429131601.10536.uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/10536] [3.4 regression] Linux kernel miscompiled on s390
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02781.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10536



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-24 16:27 -------
This looks fixed on the mainline (20030824):
test:
.LFB3:
        st      %r13,52(%r15)
.LCFI0:
        bras    %r13,.L3
.L2:
        .align  4
.LC0:
        .long   global_var
        .align  2
.L3:
        l       %r1,.LC0-.L2(%r13)
        l       %r0,0(%r1)
#APP
        %r0
#NO_APP
        l       %r13,52(%r15)
        br      %r14
Could you comment on if this asm is right, I added %0 to the asm to see what the register 
is?