From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-68758-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8083 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2003 19:04:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8073 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2003 19:04:42 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 19:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030824190442.8072.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
References: <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02815.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-08-24 19:04 -------
Toon, any news on this one?