public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
@ 2003-08-03 18:29 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-03 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028



------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-03 18:29 -------
HJL's patches are unacceptable for various reasons explained on the list.

The standalone demangler written in C currently in libiberty needs to be fixed
(or replaced by a similar object written in C).  The standalone C++ demangler
could perhaps be converted to C if I had a copy of cfront.  ;-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
  2003-08-03 18:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-04 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028


bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bkoz at redhat dot com      |neroden at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-04 16:01 -------
Nathan has volunteered to fix the "C" demangler. Thanks! You can find the
current bugs in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/demangle. 

-benjamin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
  2003-08-03 18:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
  2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2003-08-04 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028



------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2003-08-04 16:11 -------
libstdc++ is not needed to verify demangler in libiberty. I added all the
needed testcases to libiberty. If "make check" in libiberty passes without
a single demangler failure, the demangler is fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
  2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com @ 2003-08-04 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028



------- Additional Comments From neroden at twcny dot rr dot com  2003-08-04 16:28 -------
Subject: Re:  The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work
 on some symbols

bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028
> 
> 
> bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          AssignedTo|bkoz at redhat dot com      |neroden at gcc dot gnu dot
>                    |                            |org
>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-04 16:01 -------
> Nathan has volunteered to fix the "C" demangler. Thanks! You can find the
> current bugs in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/demangle. 

Oh good; it's unfixable without a list of bugs, of course... :-)

I'm afraid I've been delaying all work on libiberty due to the copyright 
issues in libiberty, so this won't actually get done until that's 
resolved. :-/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
@ 2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-23  6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-24 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028


neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |---


------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-24 19:57 -------
This is probably not going to be fixed for 3.4.  (Although I will make an effort, I seriously doubt it will be doable in time.)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-23  6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-01  3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-23  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-23 06:56 -------
The demangler has been fixed for some testcases but still need some more work.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-11-23  6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-12-01  3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-23 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-23 21:42 -------
Ian Lance Taylor has been doing the work on the new libiberty demangler. 
Everyone thank him.  :-)

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols
       [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-12-01  3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-01  3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-01 03:03 -------
Closing as fixed because it is fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11028


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-01  3:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20030529141038.11028.hjl@lucon.org>
2003-08-03 18:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/11028] The standalone C++ demangler doesn't work on some symbols neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-04 16:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-04 16:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2003-08-04 16:28 ` neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
2003-08-24 19:57 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-23  6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-23 21:42 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-01  3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).