From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20083 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2003 12:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20069 invoked by uid 48); 25 Aug 2003 12:43:25 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030825124325.20068.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030825123146.12051.Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch> References: <20030825123146.12051.Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12051] [3.4internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02905.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Summary|internal compiler error: in |[3.4internal compiler error: |pop_binding, at |in pop_binding, at |cp/decl.c:1138 |cp/decl.c:1138 Target Milestone|--- |3.4 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 12:43 ------- I can reproduce this on the mainline (20030823) and this used to work in 3.3 so this is a regression, also removing the invalid code about the `iterator' GCC still ICEs. I am reducing this one also.