* [Bug c++/12051] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
@ 2003-08-25 12:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 12:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 12:35 -------
Most likely related to bug 11886.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
2003-08-25 12:35 ` [Bug c++/12051] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-25 12:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 12:43 ` [Bug c++/12051] [3.4internal " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 12:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=4649)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4649&action=view)
pr12051.ii
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] [3.4internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
2003-08-25 12:35 ` [Bug c++/12051] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 12:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-25 12:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 13:27 ` [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[3.4internal compiler error:
|pop_binding, at |in pop_binding, at
|cp/decl.c:1138 |cp/decl.c:1138
Target Milestone|--- |3.4
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 12:43 -------
I can reproduce this on the mainline (20030823) and this used to work in 3.3 so this is a
regression, also removing the invalid code about the `iterator' GCC still ICEs.
I am reducing this one also.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-25 12:43 ` [Bug c++/12051] [3.4internal " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-25 13:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 13:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-25 13:27:37
date| |
Summary|[3.4internal compiler error:|[3.4 Regression] internal
|in pop_binding, at |compiler error: in
|cp/decl.c:1138 |pop_binding, at
| |cp/decl.c:1138
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 13:27 -------
Here is the reduced sources:
typedef struct tableDescriptor_st {
} TABLEDESCRIPTOR_ST;
class TTable{
class iterator { };
};
class TTableDescriptor : public TTable {
typedef tableDescriptor_st* iterator;
};
class TGenericTable : public TTable
{
TTableDescriptor *fColDescriptors;
class iterator { };
TGenericTable() : TTable(), fColDescriptors(0) {}
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-25 13:27 ` [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-25 13:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-25 13:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-27 15:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 13:29 -------
Here is the sources reduced some more:
struct tableDescriptor_st { };
class TTable{ class iterator { }; };
class TTableDescriptor : public TTable { typedef tableDescriptor_st* iterator; };
class TGenericTable : public TTable
{
TTableDescriptor *fColDescriptors;
class iterator { };
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-25 13:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-25 13:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-27 15:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-25 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|3.4 20030822 |
GCC host triplet|Intel x86 |
GCC target triplet|Intel x86 |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-25 13:36 -------
>From Phil's regression hunter: Search converges between 2003-07-29-trunk (#357) and 2003-
07-30-trunk (#358).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/12051] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138
2003-08-25 12:31 [Bug c++/12051] New: internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/decl.c:1138 Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-25 13:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-27 15:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-27 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12051
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-27 15:11 -------
This is a dup of bug 11871 which is fixed now on the mainline.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11871 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread