From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2347 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2003 21:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2335 invoked by uid 48); 27 Aug 2003 21:11:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030827211144.2334.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "zack at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030827204425.12083.yuri@tsoft.com> References: <20030827204425.12083.yuri@tsoft.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/12083] [IMPROVEMENT PROPOSITION] To have builtin function comparing memory backwards X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg03094.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12083 ------- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-27 21:11 ------- The appropriate name for such an intrinsic would be __builtin_rmemcmp. I admit to not seeing the utility, but additional intrinsics don't cost much, and you must have a use for such a thing.