From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9764 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2003 04:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9744 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2003 04:49:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 04:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030901044941.9742.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030831210930.12118.mkgnu@gmx.net> References: <20030831210930.12118.mkgnu@gmx.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/12118] Add function attribute that treats C code as plain asm X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12118 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P3 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-01 04:49 ------- I want to say if you want no return instruction use an asm file because C is not asm.