* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2003-06-29 9:19 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-07-04 11:38 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2003-06-29 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-06-29 9:19 ` [Bug optimization/11366] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2003-07-04 11:38 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-09 7:31 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-04 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-04 11:38 -------
Might be related to PR 11198.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-06-29 9:19 ` [Bug optimization/11366] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-07-04 11:38 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-09 7:31 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-07-14 18:17 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de @ 2003-07-09 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-09 07:31 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Might be related to PR 11198.
No. Rechecked with 3.3 CVS 20030708.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-09 7:31 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
@ 2003-07-14 18:17 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-14 18:44 ` james at nocrew dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-14 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-14 18:17 -------
Out of interest, since you are still using XFree86-4.2.1, have you made sure
you compiled XFree86 with -fno-strict-aliasing, a thing that is done
automatically since 4.3.0?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-14 18:17 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-14 18:44 ` james at nocrew dot org
2003-07-14 19:14 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: james at nocrew dot org @ 2003-07-14 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From james at nocrew dot org 2003-07-14 18:44 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles
XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
"sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> ------- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-14 18:17 -------
> Out of interest, since you are still using XFree86-4.2.1, have you made sure
> you compiled XFree86 with -fno-strict-aliasing, a thing that is done
> automatically since 4.3.0?
Yes, I tried this; it doesn't help.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-14 18:44 ` james at nocrew dot org
@ 2003-07-14 19:14 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-15 5:46 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-14 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-14 19:14 -------
I have no other idea then, 4.2 already had -fno-merge-constants and I can't
think of another promising option to try. Maybe -fno-strength-reduce?
Otherwise you have to narrow down the bugreport to a single miscompiled file,
we won't be able to help you otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-14 19:14 ` sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-15 5:46 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-07-16 16:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de @ 2003-07-15 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-15 05:46 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I have no other idea then, 4.2 already had -fno-merge-constants and
> I can't think of another promising option to try. Maybe
> -fno-strength-reduce? Otherwise you have to narrow down the
> bugreport to a single miscompiled file, we won't be able to help you
> otherwise.
Daniel, Branden,
I see, that on Debian only -O2 is used, not any of the mentioned
flags.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-15 5:46 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
@ 2003-07-16 16:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-17 2:52 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-16 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-16 16:08 -------
Can you also try with -fno-gcse, since there was a bug in gcse where it would miscompile
a bitfields.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-16 16:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-17 2:52 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 3:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pme at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-17 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
pme at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pme at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-17 02:52 -------
Ideally, what we'd really need from the Debian team are:
1) the file that gets miscompiled, and
2) the -f flag which causes it
(1) is essential. (2) would be nice but not crucial. The "easy" way to
find (2) is to compile with "-fFOO" where FOO is one of the flags
turned on by -O2, as listed in the manual. Iterate over the list until
you find the FOO that causes the breakage. Building with "-O2 -fno-FOO"
should give you all the /other/ benefits as well as working code.
This goes much faster, of course, if you can identify (1), then you only
have to recompile that file.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-17 2:52 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-17 3:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-20 0:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-17 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4 |3.3.1
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-17 03:08 -------
I would also use -W -Wall and see if there is any warnings that could be causing this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-17 3:08 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-20 0:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-24 18:49 ` branden at debian dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-20 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.3.1 |3.3.2
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-20 00:46 -------
Until we have a test case for this PR, there is nothing that we can do.
Therefore, I've postponed it until GCC 3.3.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-20 0:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-24 18:49 ` branden at debian dot org
2003-07-24 19:01 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: branden at debian dot org @ 2003-07-24 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From branden at debian dot org 2003-07-24 18:49 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:45:02AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > I have no other idea then, 4.2 already had -fno-merge-constants and
> > I can't think of another promising option to try. Maybe
> > -fno-strength-reduce? Otherwise you have to narrow down the
> > bugreport to a single miscompiled file, we won't be able to help you
> > otherwise.
>
> Daniel, Branden,
>
> I see, that on Debian only -O2 is used, not any of the mentioned
> flags.
Can someone give me an idea of what the proper followup to this message
might be? Is more information required?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-24 18:49 ` branden at debian dot org
@ 2003-07-24 19:01 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-13 7:45 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pme at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-24 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From pme at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-24 19:01 -------
> Can someone give me an idea of what the proper followup to this message
> might be? Is more information required?
Yes, more information is required. See comment #8 and comment #9.
The "other mentioned flags" are the flags mentioned in comments 3, 4, 5, and 7.
I believe those are a subset of the possible ones mentioned in comment 8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-24 19:01 ` pme at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-13 7:45 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-08-25 0:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2003-08-13 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2003-08-13 07:45 -------
It looks like this is fixed with Jim Wilson's alias.c patch(?), at least I am
unable to reproduce the failure on the 20030812 3.3 branch.
Checked on i386-linux, need to recheck on powerpc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-13 7:45 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2003-08-25 0:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-09-02 9:11 ` branden at debian dot org
2003-09-02 22:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-25 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-08-25 00:40 -------
Any news about this on powerpc? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-25 0:40 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-09-02 9:11 ` branden at debian dot org
2003-09-02 22:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: branden at debian dot org @ 2003-09-02 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From branden at debian dot org 2003-09-02 09:11 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
This problem appears to have been fixed by:
gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update to gcc-3.3.2 CVS 20030812.
- Fixes generation of wrong code for XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation
and/or validation. Closes: #196090.
* Update NEWS files.
* Change ix86 default CPU type for code generation:
- i386-linux -> i486-linux
- i386-gnu -> i586-gnu
- i386-freebsd-gnu -> i486-freebsd-gnu
Use -march=i386 to target i386 CPUs.
-- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:31:28 +0200
Thanks for fixing it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
2003-06-29 9:19 [Bug optimization/11366] New: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-02 9:11 ` branden at debian dot org
@ 2003-09-02 22:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-02 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-02 22:46 -------
Thanks for filing this bug, I am going to mark this as a dup of bug 11319 which is meta bug for
the aliasing bugs.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11319 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread