[Bug libgcj/7608] libgcj build fails

[Bug libgcj/7608] libgcj build fails

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-25 21:56 -------
Can you try to bootstrap gcc 3.3, since 3.2 is no longer supported or being updated?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608



------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org  2003-06-13 15:04 -------
No, rather of broken GNU binutils and/or misconfiguration.

According to http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*, all GNU
binutils prior to 2.11.2 have known bugs on Solaris. Moreover, CONFIG_SHELL must
be set to /bin/ksh in the environment before configuring.

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[gregd@broadcom.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608



------- Additional Comments From gregd@broadcom.com  2003-06-13 17:33 -------
Subject: Re:  libgcj build fails


I have not tried this like I said I would.  I believe I will have time 
this weekend and let you know by Monday.  I will make sure I use the 
latest binutils.

Cheers,
Greg

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[dhazeghi at yahoo dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-18 18:56 -------
Looks an awful lot like what Alan fixed in binutils (I'm presuming 2.14): http://mail.gnu.org/
archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-09/msg00263.html. Eric, perhaps we should update the 
required binuilts for Solaris?

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608



------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr  2003-07-18 19:31 -------
Subject: Re:  libgcj build fails

> Looks an awful lot like what Alan fixed in binutils (I'm
> presuming 2.14):
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-09/msg00263.html.

Indeed.

> Eric, perhaps we should update the required binuilts for Solaris?

Probably, but I'm not the best person to ask since I don't use GNU binutils 
on Solaris. Maybe ask Alan directly?

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[dhazeghi at yahoo dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amodra at bigpond dot net
                   |                            |dot au


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-18 20:19 -------
Alan, you fixed a bug much like the one in this report last September as a binutils bug. To avoid 
having this problem re-reported, should we recommend a certain minimum version of binutils on 
Solaris in the install documentaton? Thanks,

Dara

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608



------- Additional Comments From amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-19 03:34 -------
I made another fix on 2003-06-19.  See
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-06/msg00679.html
Unfortunately, this was after the 2.14 release, and means we don't have an
offical binutils release with the fix.  2.14.1 will contain the fix, as will
2.15.  Meanwhile 64 bit Sparc can use CVS mainline binutils, or one of HJ's
recent releases.

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |build, documentation
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-08-04 02:44:33
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-04 02:44 -------
Already analysised by Alan Modra, just need a new version of binutils (but a currently 
unreleased one).

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |niki dot waibel at gmx dot
                   |                            |net


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-26 13:14 -------
*** Bug 12061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/7608] libgcj build fails

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7608


ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-08 08:08 -------
This is a binutils bug.