public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
@ 2003-06-05  1:09 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-06-05  6:17 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-05  1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GCC build triplet|                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.8
   GCC host triplet|                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.8
 GCC target triplet|                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.8


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-05 01:09 -------
Eric,

now that the testcase has arrived would you mind taking a look at this one...? Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
  2003-06-05  1:09 ` [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-06-05  6:17 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
  2003-06-05  7:05 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr @ 2003-06-05  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365



------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr  2003-06-05 06:17 -------
Subject: Re:  [sparc] bug in code generator

> now that the testcase has arrived would you mind taking a look at this
> one...? Thanks,

As you can see in the audit trail, I failed to reproduce the bug the last 
time I looked at it. But I'll certainly revisit in the near future.

Thanks for bugging it about it :-)





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
  2003-06-05  1:09 ` [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-06-05  6:17 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
@ 2003-06-05  7:05 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
  2003-06-28 19:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr @ 2003-06-05  7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365



------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr  2003-06-05 07:05 -------
Subject: Re:  [sparc] bug in code generator

> Thanks for bugging it about it :-)

...bugging me about it...





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-06-05  7:05 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
@ 2003-06-28 19:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-07-02 12:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-06-28 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-06-28 19:30:07
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-06-28 19:30 -------
Should not be in waiting.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-06-28 19:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-02 12:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-09-08  7:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-02 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365


ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-02 12:36 -------
I definitely can't reproduce: I managed to extract a reduced testcase from all
the code posted here, but it doesn't fail with GCC 3.2.2, 3.2.3 or 3.3.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 12:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-08  7:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-09-09  5:43 ` urazov at yahoo dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-08  7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365


ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-08 07:19 -------
No feedback for 3 months and I can't reproduce.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-09-08  7:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-09  5:43 ` urazov at yahoo dot com
  2003-09-09  6:17 ` [Bug target/10365] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-09-09 15:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: urazov at yahoo dot com @ 2003-09-09  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365



------- Additional Comments From urazov at yahoo dot com  2003-09-09 05:43 -------
Subject: Re:  [sparc] bug in code generator

I have sent test case approximately one month ago. If
it lost I can resend it in a few weeks because I am
relocating from West to East coast. Meanwhile you may
want to load GSL build it and run test. Test will
fail!

--- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365
> 
> 
> ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                    
> |Added
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|WAITING                    
> |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                           
> |INVALID
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc
> dot gnu dot org  2003-09-08 07:19 -------
> No feedback for 3 months and I can't reproduce.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
> someone who is.


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-09-09  5:43 ` urazov at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-09-09  6:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-09-09 15:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-09  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365


ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[sparc] bug in code         |bug in code generator
                   |generator                   |


------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-09 06:17 -------
Which testcase? The only testcase I see attached to this PR is mine, but it
unfortunately doesn't exhibit the problem. Where did you send it?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/10365] bug in code generator
       [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-09-09  6:17 ` [Bug target/10365] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-09 15:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-09 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-09 15:03 -------
The test case did not get lost but Eric said "I definitely can't reproduce: I managed to extract a 
reduced testcase from all the code posted here, but it doesn't fail with GCC 3.2.2, 3.2.3 or 3.3."


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-09 15:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20030409201600.10365.urazov@yahoo.com>
2003-06-05  1:09 ` [Bug target/10365] [sparc] bug in code generator dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-06-05  6:17 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
2003-06-05  7:05 ` ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
2003-06-28 19:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-02 12:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-08  7:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-09  5:43 ` urazov at yahoo dot com
2003-09-09  6:17 ` [Bug target/10365] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-09 15:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).