public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "d dot frey at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030909231921.24364.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030628090748.11357.d.frey@gmx.de>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11357



------- Additional Comments From d dot frey at gmx dot de  2003-09-09 23:19 -------
Subject: Re:  no conversion of build-in binary operator
	argument attempted

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 06:29, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Note on the mainline, GCC accepts this one.  Any news on the DR?

Not yet. I asked Daveed Vandervoorde, he told me that the DR was opened
and will be published with the next cycle. I'll keep an eye on it and
report any progress, but this will most likely not happen before
November. Since than, the GCC is not to blame for any behaviour as both
ways are... !wrong :)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-09 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-28  9:07 [Bug c++/11357] New: " d dot frey at gmx dot de
2003-06-28 18:00 ` [Bug c++/11357] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-06-28 18:06 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-06-30  0:07 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2003-07-01  7:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2003-07-01  7:52 ` daniel dot frey at aixigo dot de
2003-07-01  8:27 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2003-08-04  0:30 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-09-08  4:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-09 23:19 ` d dot frey at gmx dot de [this message]
2003-09-09 23:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-10  0:17 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-09-10  1:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-09-10  1:51 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-09-10  3:07 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-09-10 13:36 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-09-17 18:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-17 22:07 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-22  1:42 ` d dot frey at gmx dot de
2003-09-22  4:18 ` [Bug c++/11357] [DR 425?] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-26 22:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-30  4:31 ` [Bug c++/11357] [DR 425] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030909231921.24364.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).