From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3598 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2003 08:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3532 invoked by uid 48); 12 Sep 2003 08:18:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030912081838.3530.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se> References: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/10392] [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00959.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10392 ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-12 08:18 ------- It would be nice to have a testcase (a runnable one of course). Could you write it and post it here (I don't have access to SH hardware)? I'll commit it along with my patch.