From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-70313-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5438 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2003 23:10:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5431 invoked by uid 48); 12 Sep 2003 23:10:50 -0000
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030912231050.5430.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "dkegel at ixiacom dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se>
References: <20030413145600.10392.marcus@mc.pp.se>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/10392] [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg01014.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10392



------- Additional Comments From dkegel at ixiacom dot com  2003-09-12 23:10 -------
Er, except maybe the dg-do header needs to be changed a bit, I dunno.  
I haven't tested it with dg, just standalone.