From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21233 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2003 05:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21217 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2003 05:51:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030914055115.21216.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030913175539.12269.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20030913175539.12269.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12269] Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg01062.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12269 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-14 05:51 ------- If it is caused by the patch which you say it is, then it is most likely a sharing problem rather than the patch itself and by looking at the patch I really think this is a rtl sharing problem. I wish there was a way to prove it was.