* [Bug optimization/11162] new-ra bug
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
@ 2003-06-11 22:24 ` tm@kloo.net
2003-06-11 22:25 ` tm@kloo.net
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: tm@kloo.net @ 2003-06-11 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From tm@kloo.net 2003-06-11 22:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=4205)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4205&action=view)
testcase
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] new-ra bug
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
2003-06-11 22:24 ` [Bug optimization/11162] " tm@kloo.net
@ 2003-06-11 22:25 ` tm@kloo.net
2003-06-11 22:47 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: tm@kloo.net @ 2003-06-11 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From tm@kloo.net 2003-06-11 22:25 -------
GDB dump of basic blocks at abort point:
(gdb) print *bb
$2 = {head = 0x404aa898, end = 0x404aaa7c, head_tree = 0x0, end_tree
succ = 0x0, local_set = 0x0, cond_local_set = 0x0, global_live_at_
global_live_at_end = 0x843ca40, aux = 0x2, index = 0, prev_bb = 0x
next_bb = 0x838a870, loop_depth = 0, loop_father = 0x8496dd8, coun
flags = 5}
(gdb) print bb->succ
$3 = 0x0
(gdb) call debug_bb(bb)
;; Basic block 0, loop depth 0, count 0
;; Registers live at start: 4 [r4] 5 [r5] 14 [r14] 15 [r15] 145 [ap]
(note:HI 38 2 46 0 [bb 0] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn/f 46 38 47 0 (set (mem:SI (pre_dec:SI (reg/f:SI 15 r15)) [0 S4
(reg/f:SI 14 r14)) -1 (nil)
(expr_list:REG_INC (reg/f:SI 15 r15)
(nil)))
(insn/f 47 46 48 0 (set (reg/f:SI 14 r14)
(reg/f:SI 15 r15)) -1 (nil)
(nil))
(note 48 47 3 0 NOTE_INSN_PROLOGUE_END)
(note:HI 3 48 4 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(note:HI 4 3 5 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(note:HI 5 4 12 0 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
(note:HI 12 5 13 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(note:HI 13 12 16 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(insn:HI 16 13 17 0 (set (reg:SI 1 r1 [165])
(symbol_ref:SI ("hash_find_channel") [flags 0x41] <function_
nnel>)) 123 {movsi_ie} (nil)
(nil))
(call_insn/j:HI 17 16 44 0 (parallel [
(call (mem:SI (reg:SI 1 r1 [165]) [0 S4 A32])
(const_int 0 [0x0]))
(use (reg:PSI 151 fpscr))
(return)
]) 177 {sibcalli} (insn_list 16 (nil))
(nil)
(expr_list (use (reg:SI 5 r5 [ chptr ]))
(expr_list (use (reg:SI 4 r4 [ chname ]))
(nil))))
(insn 44 17 18 0 (use (reg/i:SI 0 r0 [ <result> ])) -1 (insn_list 17
(nil))
;; Registers live at end: 0 [r0] 14 [r14] 15 [r15] 145 [ap] 151 []
;; Successors:
(gdb)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] new-ra bug
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
2003-06-11 22:24 ` [Bug optimization/11162] " tm@kloo.net
2003-06-11 22:25 ` tm@kloo.net
@ 2003-06-11 22:47 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
2003-06-12 6:08 ` matz@suse.de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rth@gcc.gnu.org @ 2003-06-11 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
rth@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|rth@gcc.gnu.org |matz@suse.de
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-11 22:47:48
date| |
------- Additional Comments From rth@gcc.gnu.org 2003-06-11 22:47 -------
The CFG code gets confused by the addition of a USE insn after a sibcall.
Sibcalls are supposed to end the block (and the function!), so the fact
that we have an instruction following one (even if its fake) is confusing.
Moreover, I can't figure out why the USE is being added at all. There is
a non-explanation in ra.c, but if I change like so, the test case passes.
r~
Index: ra.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/ra.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -c -p -d -u -r1.8 ra.c
--- ra.c 7 Mar 2003 22:06:16 -0000 1.8
+++ ra.c 11 Jun 2003 22:43:10 -0000
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ reg_alloc ()
/* We currently rely on the existence of the return value USE as
one of the last insns. Add it if it's not there anymore. */
- if (last)
+ if (0 && last)
{
edge e;
for (e = EXIT_BLOCK_PTR->pred; e; e = e->pred_next)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] new-ra bug
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-11 22:47 ` rth@gcc.gnu.org
@ 2003-06-12 6:08 ` matz@suse.de
2003-06-12 6:10 ` matz@suse.de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: matz@suse.de @ 2003-06-12 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From matz@suse.de 2003-06-12 06:08 -------
Subject: Re: new-ra bug
On 11 Jun 2003, rth@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Moreover, I can't figure out why the USE is being added at all.
Crappy obsolete design ;-) I didn't use mark_regs_live_at_end() to force
the return register live at the end, partly because I can basically only
deal with real register references (the flow.c code simply sets some bits
in the liveness bitmaps). But it needs to be made live somehow, hence I
simply added such fake uses. In the new-ra branch I added code to delete
these instructions after allocation again. (Or rather I would have had,
had I committed ;( ). Like the below patch. It also fixes the testcase.
Somewhen I need to go over this again, to use something similar to the
mark_regs_live_at_end() function, because this method is bound to break
(for instance I only add the return value use, but not all the other regs
which that function might add).
Index: ra.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/ra.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 ra.c
--- ra.c 7 Mar 2003 22:06:16 -0000 1.8
+++ ra.c 12 Jun 2003 06:06:03 -0000
@@ -669,6 +669,7 @@ reg_alloc ()
int changed;
FILE *ra_dump_file = rtl_dump_file;
rtx last = get_last_insn ();
+ bitmap use_insns = BITMAP_XMALLOC ();
if (! INSN_P (last))
last = prev_real_insn (last);
@@ -686,11 +687,13 @@ reg_alloc ()
last = bb->end;
if (!INSN_P (last) || GET_CODE (PATTERN (last)) != USE)
{
- rtx insns;
+ rtx insn, insns;
start_sequence ();
use_return_register ();
insns = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
+ for (insn = insns; insn; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ bitmap_set_bit (use_insns, INSN_UID (insn));
emit_insn_after (insns, last);
}
}
@@ -868,6 +871,22 @@ reg_alloc ()
no_new_pseudos = 1;
rtl_dump_file = ra_dump_file;
+ {
+ edge e;
+ for (e = EXIT_BLOCK_PTR->pred; e; e = e->pred_next)
+ {
+ basic_block bb = e->src;
+ last = bb->end;
+ for (last = bb->end; last; last = PREV_INSN (last))
+ {
+ if (last == bb->head)
+ break;
+ if (bitmap_bit_p (use_insns, INSN_UID (last)))
+ delete_insn (last);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ BITMAP_XFREE (use_insns);
/* Some spill insns could've been inserted after trapping calls, i.e.
at the end of a basic block, which really ends at that call.
Fixup that breakages by adjusting basic block boundaries. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] new-ra bug
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-12 6:08 ` matz@suse.de
@ 2003-06-12 6:10 ` matz@suse.de
2003-09-14 18:59 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh dank at kegel dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: matz@suse.de @ 2003-06-12 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
matz@suse.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-12 6:10 ` matz@suse.de
@ 2003-09-14 18:59 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-09-14 20:24 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-09-14 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2003-09-14 18:37 -------
Here's a simpler testcase:
int foo(char *p1)
{
return bar(p1);
}
I swear to god that's what it boiled down to. This fails with
/usr/gcc-3.4-20030903-glibc-2.3.2/bin/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -m4 -fnew-ra
z.c
z.c: In function `foo':
z.c:4: error: Abnormal edges for no purpose in bb 0
z.c:4: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-14 18:59 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-09-14 20:24 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-09-14 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-09-14 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2003-09-14 20:08 -------
For completeness, here's a log using the original testcase:
/usr/gcc-3.4-20030903-glibc-2.3.2/bin/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m4 -O2 -fnew-ra
channel.i
channel.i: In function `find_channel':
channel.i:8226: error: Abnormal edges for no purpose in bb 0
channel.i:8226: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed
This appears to be a dup of bug 9900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-14 20:24 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-09-14 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-14 21:10 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-14 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eezyy at gmx dot net
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-14 20:24 -------
*** Bug 9900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-14 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-14 21:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-15 17:39 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-14 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Summary|[-fnew-ra] ICE compiling |[3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra]
|channel.i on sh |ICE compiling channel.i on
| |sh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-14 21:10 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-15 17:39 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-09-15 17:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-09-15 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2003-09-15 16:27 -------
This ICE seemed to go away when I apply the fix
for bug 11587. Can someone else verify this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-15 17:39 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-09-15 17:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
2003-11-30 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2003-09-15 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
dank at kegel dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank at kegel dot com
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2003-09-15 17:43 -------
I've prepared a patch to add a testcase for this PR to the testsuite; see
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/patches/gcc-3.3.1/pr11162-1-test.patch
I'll submit it to gcc-patches in a couple days if nobody squawks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-15 17:46 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2003-11-30 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-30 21:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-30 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |13246
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [3.4 Regression] [-fnew-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-30 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-30 21:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-27 17:15 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [new-ra] " dank at kegel dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-30 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.4 |3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [new-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-30 21:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-27 17:15 ` dank at kegel dot com
2004-03-02 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-01-27 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-01-27 17:15 -------
I just verified it's not fixed in gcc-3.3-20040119 (didn't expect it to be).
I'll verify against a current gcc-3.4 snapshot next...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [new-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-27 17:15 ` [Bug optimization/11162] [new-ra] " dank at kegel dot com
@ 2004-03-02 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-02 5:15 ` dank at kegel dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-02 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2003-06-11 22:47:48 |2004-03-02 01:36:11
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/11162] [new-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-02 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-02 5:15 ` dank at kegel dot com
2005-01-03 12:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11162] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-17 15:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dank at kegel dot com @ 2004-03-02 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2004-03-02 05:15 -------
Dang, lost my hardware before I could verify it.
I can't test on sh4 anymore.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/11162] [new-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-02 5:15 ` dank at kegel dot com
@ 2005-01-03 12:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-17 15:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-03 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-03 12:08 -------
new-ra bug, so SUSPENDING.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/11162] [new-ra] ICE compiling channel.i on sh
2003-06-11 22:24 [Bug optimization/11162] New: new-ra bug tm@kloo.net
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-03 12:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11162] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-17 15:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-17 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 15:24 -------
Closing as wiill not fix as new-ra was removed from the mainline.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread