From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6298 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 22:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6279 invoked by uid 48); 23 Sep 2003 22:03:22 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030923220322.6278.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "falk at debian dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030922232258.12373.tm@kloo.net> References: <20030922232258.12373.tm@kloo.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/12373] ICE when generating RTX on valid code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg01818.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12373 falk at debian dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-09-23 22:03 ------- I see this too on alphaev67 20030923. Test case: typedef long va_greg; typedef double va_freg; typedef struct { va_greg * va_next_o; va_greg * va_next_o_limit; va_freg * va_next_fp; va_freg * va_next_fp_limit; va_greg * va_next_stack; } gnuc_va_list; int vprintf(const char *, gnuc_va_list); I suppose the struct is coming from some system header, and is only valid for that system. Anyway, gcc shouldn't crash.