From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13441 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 18:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13362 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2003 18:03:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030926180307.13359.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12419] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg02033.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-09-26 18:03 ------- Discussion about this is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg01125.html