From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20034 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2003 06:36:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20021 invoked by uid 48); 27 Sep 2003 06:36:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030927063622.20018.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg02088.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |pessimizes-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-09-27 06:36:21 date| | Summary|Performace regression: poor |[3.3/3.4 Regression] |optimization of const memory|Performace regression: poor | |optimization of const memory Target Milestone|--- |3.4 ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-27 06:36 ------- I can confirm this on the mainline (20030925) and in 3.3.2 (20030815). It does not happen in 3.3 (20030304).