public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030929150518.29829.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11706
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-09-29 15:05 -------
Subject: Re: std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code
"rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Why exactly should cmath not use ::pow
we should not use ::pow because there is no ::pow in <cmath> -- at
least in principle.
| (or __builtin_pow())?
I remember Roger supplied builtins for various T in pow(T, int).
They should help.
-- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-29 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-29 12:03 [Bug libstdc++/11706] New: " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-07-29 12:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/11706] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-29 12:53 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-07-29 13:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-07-29 13:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-08-23 1:56 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-09-29 15:05 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-09-29 15:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-09-29 15:29 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-09-29 15:41 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net [this message]
2003-09-29 15:43 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-09-29 17:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-09-29 17:36 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-11-13 21:42 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-12-05 23:52 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-06 18:26 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-12-06 19:26 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2003-12-06 19:50 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-12-06 20:05 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-12-06 20:33 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 15:14 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 15:34 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 15:43 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 19:51 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 20:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 20:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 20:26 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 20:43 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 22:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 22:39 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-10 22:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-10 22:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-10 23:39 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-11 10:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 11:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 12:06 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-11 18:55 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-11 19:04 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-11 20:14 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-12 1:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-16 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 18:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-02 4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-02 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-12 16:17 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2005-02-07 22:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-10 0:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-10 1:13 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-02-10 1:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 19:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 19:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-07 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030929150518.29829.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).