public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
@ 2003-09-30 11:17 suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 11:25 ` [Bug java/12459] " suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz @ 2003-09-30 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
Summary: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Unless I'm going completely mad, this is not valid code.
$ cat temp.java
class x
{
int i;
}
class temp
{
int foo()
{
return x.i;
}
}
$ gcj -O2 -S temp.java
$ echo $?
0
I think gcj needs more people using it for real development - it's actually
fairly solid on code that compiles, it's just the typos that confuse it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
@ 2003-09-30 11:25 ` suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz @ 2003-09-30 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 11:25 ` [Bug java/12459] " suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
@ 2003-09-30 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-30 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-30 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 15:38 -------
This is a dup of bug 1333 which is fixed on the mainline.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1333 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 11:25 ` [Bug java/12459] " suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-30 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-30 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-30 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 19:54 -------
Okay I looked at this again and this is not a dup.
The problem is that gcj is accepting x.i (and turns it into the offset of i in x and uses that offset on
this).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Checks, schmecks, who needs'em.
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-30 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-09-30 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-15 6:49 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-09-30 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-09-30 19:55:52
date| |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-09-30 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-15 6:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-15 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-15 06:49 -------
Actually now on the mainline it does: ((struct x *)this)->i which is just plainly wrong.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2004-04-15 04:53:15 |2004-07-15 06:49:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-15 6:49 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-22 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01 18:03 ` kon at iki dot fi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-22 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-22 21:55 -------
*** Bug 16677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vadimn at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-22 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-01 18:03 ` kon at iki dot fi
2005-02-01 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15 11:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kon at iki dot fi @ 2005-02-01 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From kon at iki dot fi 2005-02-01 18:03 -------
Shouldn't this block bug 18131?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-01 18:03 ` kon at iki dot fi
@ 2005-02-01 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15 11:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:05 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Shouldn't this block bug 18131?
Yes I must have missed this bug when creating that meta-bug.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |18131
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-01 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-15 11:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-15 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 11:56 -------
*** Bug 22496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i_mezhirov at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-15 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-30 11:17 [Bug java/12459] New: Checks, schmecks, who needs'em suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 11:25 ` [Bug java/12459] " suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz
2003-09-30 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-30 20:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-09-30 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-15 6:49 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-22 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-01 18:03 ` kon at iki dot fi
2005-02-01 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15 11:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).