From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-71781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28696 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2003 15:06:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28680 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2003 15:06:58 -0000
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031001150658.28679.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "zlomek at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030906231705.12199.gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
References: <20030906231705.12199.gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/12199] [3.3-hammer regression] long double miscompilation in gsl/amd64
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12199


zlomek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From zlomek at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-01 15:06 -------
Honza forgot to close bug report after comminting the fix.