From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-71966-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19992 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2003 19:34:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19985 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2003 19:34:38 -0000
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:34:00 -0000
From: "merkert at charter dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20031003193437.12504.merkert@charter.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/12504] New: [REGRESSION] incorrect warning of missing return statement
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12504

           Summary: [REGRESSION] incorrect warning of missing return
                    statement
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: merkert at charter dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: g++ (GCC) 3.4 20031001 (experimental)

The following code prints a warning:

cat > test.cpp <<EOF
template <class T> int foo()
{ throw 0; }
EOF
g++ -c -Wall test.cpp
test.cpp: In function `int foo()':
test.cpp:2: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void

This code compiles fine with gcc-3.3.1, so it's a regression.