From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-72546-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27009 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2003 08:15:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27002 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2003 08:15:37 -0000
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 08:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20031013081537.27001.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "jhr dot walter at t-online dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20031008065459.12536.jhr.walter@t-online.de>
References: <20031008065459.12536.jhr.walter@t-online.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/12536] Regression regarding partial ordering
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00836.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12536



------- Additional Comments From jhr dot walter at t-online dot de  2003-10-13 08:15 -------
Which is the same as GCC 3.3.1 does and still wrong IMHO.