From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27148 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2003 20:53:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27113 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2003 20:53:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031013205300.27112.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "falk at debian dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030604081727.11087.marcus@jet.franken.de> References: <20030604081727.11087.marcus@jet.franken.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/11087] gcc miscompiles raid1.c from linux kernel X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00885.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11087 ------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-10-13 20:52 ------- I don't know why Marcus considers it fixed in 3.3; the patch is certainly not in the 3.3-branch. I can reproduce the crash with raid1.c on alpha-linux with 3.3.2 20031013. The patch committed to 3_3-rhl-branch (linked in the audit trail) applies cleanly to the 3.3-branch and fixes the crash. By the way, I cannot reproduce it with the test case which was commited to 3_3-rhl-branch (20030717-1.c), so probably raid1.c should be taken as test case instead or additionally.