From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32268 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2003 14:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32260 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2003 14:57:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031014145718.32258.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "fw at deneb dot enyo dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031014131549.12614.schwab@suse.de> References: <20031014131549.12614.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12614] [3.3 regression] Can't bootstrap without gnatmake X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00968.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12614 ------- Additional Comments From fw at deneb dot enyo dot de 2003-10-14 14:57 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] Can't bootstrap without gnatmake schwab at suse dot de wrote: > But how do you then bootstrap a whole new architecture? Currently it > is impossible to build a native gnatmake with a cross compiler, at > least I haven't found a way yet. gnatmake is only required for building the documentation, it is easy to work around this issue (compared to the other troubles of porting). I agree that it's not optimal, but I don't think it's worth fixing in the current Ada bootstrap framework.