public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12615] [3.3 Regression] initializer syntax for POD structs gives parse error Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20031015112040.21264.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20031014193706.12615.bruno@clisp.org> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12615 ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-15 11:20 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] initializer syntax for POD structs gives parse error "bruno at clisp dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes: | Gabriel dos Reis writes: | > There is a standard way to express an equivalent construct. I would strongly | > suggest you use it. | | The problem with this is that it is not a syntax which is valid in | initializers _and_ expressions. I'd need to write The C99 standard syntax works in both cases The syntax you used is documented as non-supported in g++. So this is a C++ bug. -- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-15 11:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-10-14 19:37 [Bug c++/12615] New: initializer syntax for PAD " gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-14 19:47 ` [Bug c++/12615] [3.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-14 19:54 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-14 21:38 ` Joseph S. Myers 2003-10-14 22:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-10-14 20:13 ` schwab at suse dot de 2003-10-14 20:40 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-14 20:46 ` bruno at clisp dot org 2003-10-14 21:38 ` [Bug c++/12615] [3.3 Regression] initializer syntax for POD " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2003-10-14 21:40 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-15 10:44 ` bruno at clisp dot org 2003-10-15 11:20 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net [this message] 2003-10-15 11:49 ` bruno at clisp dot org 2003-10-15 16:23 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-15 18:43 ` bruno at clisp dot org 2003-10-18 11:32 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-10-18 15:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20031015112040.21264.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).