From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25910 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2003 12:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25900 invoked by uid 48); 21 Oct 2003 12:42:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20031021124236.25898.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020310104601.5911.zack@codesourcery.com> References: <20020310104601.5911.zack@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/5911] Ada runtime and utilities should be broken out to their own directory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01706.txt.bz2 List-Id: PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911 ------- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-21 12:42 ------- << This is not a mere enhancement request, it causes all sorts of build bugs, as you can see from the dependency list. >> Actually this is not quite true: most if not all the PR that have been marked as dependent on this one can be fixed independently of this issue. Concerning this specific PR, I believe everyone agrees this would be a good thing, the main question is how to achieve this. For one thing, I started looking at how you add a new e.g. libada directory (and enable its configuration and build from the top level directory) and I must admit that it is not at all clear how to to that (I'm not a configure expert anyway). Assuming "someone" would add a dummy libada directory that would get configured and built (e.g. with an empty Makefile and configure) automatically, I could then start working on providing an actual configure.in and Makefile.in to make it work for real. Any volunteer ? Arno